Skip to content

For writing-center coaches & faculty

Watch every writer. Intervene where it matters.

Built around the part of writing-center work that doesn't scale: the 1:1 consultation during a draft. Now you can hold that posture for twenty-five students at once.

What you get when the session starts.

One screen, the whole section

Each student is a tile: current draft, words today, Guardian issues, AI activity. Sort by flagged or quiet to know which session to land next.

Coach Mode you can defend

Server-enforced. The AI cannot draft prose for a student. Bypass attempts are rejected and (telemetry-only) logged. Tell academic integrity exactly what we do and do not allow.

No grading workload

We are not a gradebook. Use whatever your institution already uses. Creader handles the live coaching layer that frees you up to actually coach.

What Guardian catches that a writing-center coach would.

Other tools check spelling. Guardian reads the whole draft: every paragraph, every claim, every promise the thesis makes, and surfaces the issues a coach would catch over the student's shoulder, but for every student at once.

  1. Catches thesis drift across the draft

    When a student claims one thing in the introduction and a softer or different thing in the conclusion, Guardian flags it before submission. Same for unsupported claims and inconsistent definitions.

  2. Surfaces weak verbs and filtered perception

    "It is important to note that society tends to feel…" → Guardian asks the student to revise. Sentence by sentence, no nagging, only when it would catch a coach's eye.

  3. Reads for argument, voice, and paragraph goals

    Not just spelling. Guardian asks what the writing is doing. Does this paragraph advance the argument? Does the academic register hold? Does the section pay off its topic sentence?

  4. Maps topic sentences and section contracts

    Flags when a section ends without advancing the thesis, or when an opening promise goes unmet. Useful when a student plateaus mid-draft.

  5. Tracks evidence threading and structural payoff

    When a student introduces a source or claim, Guardian remembers, and notices when the follow-through is missing. This is the part coaches usually only catch on the third read.

How we compare

Built for one craft, not every subject.

How Creader Education compares to the status quo of WCOnline plus TA hours, Grammarly EDU, and ChatGPT EDU across live feedback, long-form support, AI policy clarity, teacher monitoring, and ghostwriting risk.
DimensionStatus quo (WCOnline + TA)Grammarly EDUChatGPT EDUCreader Education
Live in-draft feedbackNo, only at the appointmentGrammar onlyChat-onlyStory-aware, streaming
Long-form writing50-minute slot, paper-by-paperSentence-levelNo structureChapter-aware
AI policy clarity for schoolsHuman-only, no AI policy at allMechanical onlyOften blockedCoach Mode (server-enforced)
Teacher live monitoringPost-session consultant notesNoneNoneOne-screen dashboard
Can the AI ghostwrite?No AI in the loopLimitedYes, by designNo, refuses to draft

For comp coordinators with TAs

TAs observe; they do not run the org.

A consultant in Creader sees the sections you scope them to, with the same student-side visibility a teacher has: live presence, Coach exchanges, comments, Guardian flags. They can comment back. What they cannot do is anything beyond those sections.

What a consultant sees
Every student draft in their assigned sections, in real time. Coach history, teacher comments, Guardian flags, the per-student activity card.
What a consultant cannot do
Create sections, invite teachers, see other sections in the organization, change the assignment prompt, archive a classroom, or export at the org level. The consultant role looks identical to “not an org member” from any org-wide surface.
Inviting a TA
Each section has an invite flow with a role picker. Pick “Consultant” and send. The TA accepts and lands on the section dashboard with read access to drafts and comment access to the comment panel.
Removing a TA after the semester
Remove them from the section's member list. Their access ends immediately; comments they posted remain attributed to them in the archive.

Try it with one section.

Early access is free during internal testing. Your students keep every word they've drafted, on every plan we ever launch.